000 | 01969nam a22002537a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c14970 _d14970 |
||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20191107121035.0 | ||
008 | 191107b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
020 | _a9781107026056 | ||
040 | _cNVIC | ||
100 | 1 | _aNajam Haider | |
245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe Rebel and the Imam in Early Islam: _bExplorations in Muslim Historiography |
264 | 1 |
_aCambridge: _bCambridge University Press, _c2019 |
|
300 |
_a304 p., _btable; _c26 cm |
||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
505 | 0 | _aModeling Islamic historical writing -- The rise and fall of Mukhtar b. Abi 'Ubayd (d. 67/687) -- The life of Musa b. Ja'far al-Kazim (d. 183/799) -- The last years of Yahya b. 'Abd Allah (d. 187/803) -- Reconsideration -- Appendix A. The narrative elements of Mukhtar's revolt. | |
520 | _aTo what extent do contemporary approaches to the study of Islamic historiography reflect the presuppositions that informed the writing of early Muslim historians? A proper answer to this question requires a consideration of the classical and late antique periods. Numerous studies over the last fifty years have shown that Muslim political, social, and intellectual structures appropriated (and further elaborated) preexisting models. This claim is not universally applicable, but it seems to hold in areas ranging from coinage and court culture to legal codes and literature. A similar dynamic likely governed the relationship between late antique and early Muslim historical writing. At the very least, an approach that highlights such continuity promises a better understanding of the source material than does the current propensity to utilize categories drawn from a modern European context. | ||
650 | _aMukhtar Bin Abi Ubayd | ||
650 | _aMusa bin Ja'far al-Kazim | ||
650 | _aYahya bin 'Abd Allah | ||
651 | 0 |
_aIslamic Empire _xHistory _y661-750 _xHistoriography |
|
651 | 0 |
_aIslamic Empire _xHistory _y750-1258 _xHistoriography |
|
942 |
_2ddc _cBK |